But having seen Doctor Strange in the Multiverse with my own eyes, the actual truth is more benign.ĭespite Feige and Raimi both teasing that their new flick is Marvel’s first “horror movie,” it is more of the studio’s first film with horror seasoning. Meanwhile more than one tweet over the weekend has suggested that such an experience as this new Marvel movie could be inflicting a form of trauma on our youth.īased on this level of discourse, one might ponder whether Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige somehow let Raimi sneak in sequences of chainsaw mutilation and lascivious trees from his first few Evil Dead films. The piece goes on to advise most parents to not let their children see the superhero extravaganza. No less than industry trade Variety published a column this weekend in which a senior editor pondered whether Marvel “cast a spell” over the MPA to convince them not to give Doctor Strange 2 an R-rating due to its onscreen sorcery. Now, the elements which feel decidedly handcrafted by the director’s authorial sensibility- smatterings of Gothic horror, demons, and a faint mean-spiritedness-seem to be the biggest issue for a large segment of viewers. So seeing the inversion of that around Sam Raimi’s gleefully distinct and stylish Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is kind of wild. Despite their pictures generally receiving solid marks from a plurality of critics almost every outing-at least as judged by the simple up/down metric of Rotten Tomatoes-there’s always a loud contingent of detractors whose grievances should be familiar by now: a visual and narrative uniformity a lack of stylistic variation an overreliance on blue screen and CGI and where is the authorial voice? This article contains groovy Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness spoilers.Ĭriticism of Marvel Studios movies is not a new phenomenon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |